En nu een uitwijding over het financiële systeem en paradigma waar we zo lang in hebben gezeten door een van de weinige insiders. Echt super dit.
Eerst een mooie vertelling door oa’ Lee Carol ‘ die mooi bevestigt waar we met zijn allen inzitten: een verandering en een globaal ontwaken. Anno 2020.
https://www.kryon.com/cartprodimages/2020%20downloads/download_WW-Channeling-20.html
Hoe het steeds aangestuurd werd staat zoals Ronald Bernard zei ongeveer in The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion, waaruit hier paar citaten:
Most of the destructive type of “liberal” plans aim at the enlistment of the people as helpers; this plan aims at the degeneration of the people in order that they may be reduced to confusion of mind and thus manipulated. Popular movements of a ‘liberal” kind are to be encouraged, all the disruptive philosophies in religion, economies, politics and domestic life are to be sown and watered, for the purpose of so disintegrating social solidarity that a definite plan, herein set forth, may be put through without notice, and the people then molded to it when the fallacy of these philosophies is shown.
On the ruins of the hereditary aristocracy of the gentiles we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class, and over all the aristocracy of money. We have established the basis of this new aristocracy on the basis of riches, which we control, and on the science guided by our wise men”. Again “We will force up wages, which however will be of no benefit to workers, for we at the same time will cause a rise in the prices of prime necessities, pretending that this is due to the decline of agriculture and of cattle raising. We will also artfully and deeply undermine the sources of production by instilling in the workmen ideas of anarchy and encourage them in the use of alcohol, at the same time taking measures to drive all the intellectual forces of the Gentiles from the land”.
“That the true situation shall not be noticed by the Gentiles prematurelly we will mask it by a pretended effort to serve the working classes and promote great economic principles, for active propaganda will be carried on through our economic theories ‘.
“Therefore, at all costs we must deprive them of their land”.
How? “The best means to attain this is to increase- land taxes and mortgage indebtedness \ High taxes to keep the land at all, bortowed money to finance the tilling of it.
“These measures will keep land ownership in a state of unconditional subordination”.
“It is necessary for industry to deplete the Land both of laborers and capital.”
It contemplates nothing less than the playing of City against Country in the great game now being exposed. Complete control over the City by the industrial leverage, and over the Country by the debt leverage, will
enable the Hidden Players to move first the Country by saying that the City demands certain things, and then move the City by saying that the Country demands certain things, thus splitting Citizens and Farmers apart and using them against one another.
One big dent in this Program of World Control could be made if the Citizen and the Farmer could learn each other’s mind, not through self-appointed spokesmen, but directly from each other. City and Farm are drifting apart because of misrepresentation of outsiders, and in the widening rift the sinister shadow of the World Program appears. Let the Farmers look past the “Gentile fronts” in their villages or principal trading points, past them to the real controllers who are hidden.
What the people of the United States do not understand and never have understood is that while the Federal Reserve Act was governmental, the whole Federal Re- serve System is private. It is an officially created private banking system^.
Examine the first thousand persons you meet on the street, and 999 will tell you that the Federal Reserve System is a device whereby the United States Government went into the banking business for the benefit of the people. They have an idea that, like the Post Office and Custom House, a Federal Reserve Bank is a part of the Government’s official machinery.
It is natural to feel that this mistaken view has been encouraged by most of the men who are competent to write for the public on this question. Take up the standard encyclopedias, and while you will find no mis- statements of fact in them, you will find no direct state- ment that the Federal Reserve System is a private banking system; the impression carried away by the law reader is that it is a part of the Government.
The Federal Reserve System is a system of private banks, the creation of a banking aristocracy within an already existing autocracy, whereby a great proportion of banking independence was lost, and whereby it was made possible for speculative financiers to centralize great sums of money for their own purposes, beneficial or not.
That this System was useful in the artificial conditions created by war —
Mr. Warburg’s scheme succeeded just in time to take care of war conditions, he was placed on the Federal Re- serve Board in order to manage his system in practice, and though he -^as full of ideas then as to how banking could be assisted, he is disappointingly silent now as to how the people cm be relieved.
However, this is not a discussion of the Federal Reserve System, General condemnation of it w«uld be stupid, But it is bound to come up for discussion one day, and the discussion will become much freer when people under
stand that it is a system of privately owned banks, to which have been delegated certain extraordinary privileges, and that it has created a class system within the banking world, which constitutes a new order.
But go into the agricultural states, where the real wealth of the country is in the ground and in the grana- ries, and you cannot find money for the farmer.
It is a situation which none can deny and which few can explain, because the explanation is not to be found along natural lines. Unnatural conditions wear an air of mystery. Here is the United States, the richest country in the world, containing at the present hour the greatest bulk of wealth to be found anywhere on earth —real, ready, available, usable wealth; and yet it is tied up tight. and cannot move in its legitimate channels, because of manipulation which is going on as regards money.
Money is the last mystery for the popular mind to penetrate, and when it succeeds in getting “on the inside” it will discover that the mystery is not in money at all, but in its manipulation, the things which are done “in an administrative way”.
The United States has never had a President who gave evidence of understanding this matter at all. Our Presidents have always had to take their views from financiers. Money is the most public quantity in the country; it is the most federalized and governmentalized thing in the country; and yet, in the present situation, the United States Government has hardly anything to do with it, except to use various means to get it, just as the people have to get it, from those who control it.
“If the people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks…will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless…. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson in the debate over the Re-charter of the Bank Bill (1809)
“I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.” –Thomas Jefferson
“… The modern theory of the perpetuation of debt has drenched the earth with blood, and crushed its inhabitants under burdens ever accumulating.” -Thomas Jefferson
“History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” -James Madison
Mr. Warburg is not at all shocked by the idea that the Federal Reserve System is really a new kind of private banking control, because in bis European experience he saw that all the central banks were private affairs.
In his essay on “American and European Banking Methods and Bank Legislation Compared”, Mr. Warburg says: (the italics are ours)
“It may also be interesting to note that, contrary to a widespread idea, the central banks of Europe are, as a rule, not owned by the governments. As a matter of fact, neither the English, French, nor German Government owns any stock in the central bank of its country. The
Bank of England is ran entirely as a private corporation, the stockholders electing the board of directors, who rotate in holding the presidency. In France the government appoints the governor and some of the directors. In Germany the government appoints the president and a super- visory board of five members, while the stockholders elect the board if directors”.
The Monetary Commission’s plan proceeded on the theory of the Bank of England, which leaves the management entirely in the hands of business men without giving the government any part in the management or control.
(a) “without giving the government any part in the management or control”.
(b) “these central banks, while legally private cor- porations are permitted to issue the notes of the nation”.
(c) “they are custodians of practically the entire metallic reserves of the nation and the keepers of the government funds”.
(d) “in questions of national policy, the government
must rely on the willing and loyal co-operation of these central organs”.
It is not now a question whether these things are right or wrong; it is merely a question of understanding that they constitute the fact.
It is specially notable that in paragraph (d) it is a fair deduction that in questions of national policy, the government will simply have to depend not only on the patriotism but also to an extend on the permission and counsel of the financial organizations. That is a fair interpretation: questions of national policy are, by this method, rendered dependent upon the financial corporations.
Let that point be clear, quite regardless of the question whether or not this is the way national policies should be determined.
Jannet Ossenbaard maakte een indringende docu. Vanaf nu is het 18+
en
https://books.google.nl/books?id=76DhEY-2Y5cC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&redir_esc=y&hl=nl#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
The Protocols 1–19 closely follow the order of Maurice Joly’s Dialogues 1–17. For example:
| Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu | The Protocols of the Elders of Zion |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://londonreal.tv/1000000-fighting-for-freedom/
