Wat Als / What If

Wie blies de Russisch-Duitse Nord Stream I en II pijpleidingen op? Qui bono?

Een vraag die belangrijk licht schijnt op motieven en mogelijke daders. Hoewel tegennatuurlijk voor sommigen, wijst veel erop dat niet Rusland, maar juist de Verenigde Staten deze terreurdaad beging.

Stefan NoordhoekSep 28

SAVE

In een rake analyse van de gebeurtenissen in de Baltische Zee van 27 september jongstleden legt Tucker Carlson de feiten helder bloot. De vraag ‘wie profiteert?’ wordt duidelijk beantwoord: in elk geval niet Poetin, die wel gek moet zijn om z’n eigen kapitaal, z’n potentiële inkomstenstroom en z’n belangrijkste leverage richting het Energie-bedürftige Duitsland en de rest van Europa te vernietigen. 

Ondanks dat, zijn de conclusies van de westerse kranten en media die beweren dat Poetin z’n eigen pijpleiding heeft gesaboteerd, niet van de lucht.

“Fuck the EU!”

Voor Amerika is dat precies andersom. Het finaal ‘beëindigen’ van Nord Stream is niet alleen datgene waarmee zowel Joe Biden nog vóór de start van de Speciale Militaire Operaties van Rusland stoer dreigde – “Then there will be no longer a North Stream 2”. Maar ook Victoria Nuland – bekend van haar saillante telefoongesprek “Fuck the EU!” op de vooravond van de US-backed coup in 2014 waarin ze nota bene met de Amerikaanse ambassadeur in Oekraïne, Geoffrey Pyatt, bespreekt wie als VS stroman als president van Oekraïne ‘democratisch verkozen’ ging worden – zei exact hetzelfde al trots in januari van dit jaar:

“With regard to Nord Stream 2, uh, we continue to have, uh, very strong and clear conversations, uh, with our German allies. And I wanna be clear with you today: if Russia invades Ukraine one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward! One way or the other. We’ll stop Nord Stream.”

---

Wil je ook iets doneren?

---

Geen Russisch gas naar Europa

Daarnaast is het evident dat de VS profiteert van het, ook voor de toekomst, onmogelijk maken van gasleveranties van Rusland aan Europa via de Nordstream pijpleidingen. Het is de VS geweest die al voor de ingebruikname van Nord Stream II pijpleiding tussen Rusland en Duitsland, handelsembargo’s. en regelrechte dreigementen uitsprak tegen elk bedrijf dat nog maar meewerkte aan de bouw ervan. Het Europese continent moest tegen elke prijs van het Russisch gas en aan het veel duurdere Amerikaanse LNG.

En sterker nog: op dezelfde dag dat door mysterieuze omstandigheden 2 ontploffingen en 3 lekkages de Nord Stream pijpleiding voor op z’n minst lange tijd stil legden, opende – oh toeval – net een nieuwe Baltic Pipeline, die Noors gas, via Denemarken naar Polen transporteert.

Qui bono?

Niet zonder risico’s

Tucker noemt de schrijnende tegenstelling tussen de jarenlange klimaatpaniek van de Biden regering en de vreselijk belangrijke rol daarin van methaan enerzijds en de schaamteloze natuurramp die het gevolg is van het opblazen van de pijpleidingen, waarbij miljoenen kubieke meters methaan in de zee en de lucht worden losgelaten. 

Maar nog veel groter is het risico van de zoveelste escalatie die hiermee door de VS is gedaan. 

• Na decennia van bouwen aan Oekraine als strategisch bruggenhoofd om Rusland mee te kunnen breken;
• Het kantelen van de Oekrainse pro-russische regering naar een pro-VS regime in 2014;
• Het sindsdien stelselmatig laten vernederen, mishandelen en tot Untermensch degraderen van de russisch-etnische Oekraïense burgers in de Donbass en Donetsk regio’s;
• De aanhoudende bombardementen op de eigen burgerbevolking met 14.000 doden tot gevolg, 
• Het negeren van de Minsk akkoorden \en het opbouwen van een alarmerend grote NAVO troepenmacht op de stoep van Rusland.. 

waren hierin al uiterst gevaarlijke voorbereidende stappen. 

• Het weigeren van de onderhandeling met Rusland eind 2021, waarbij Rusland ter waarborg van de eigen nationale veiligheid aandrong op een soeverein en neutraal Oekraïne dat geen onderdeel van de NAVO zou worden (wat het toen en nu trouwens ook niet is) en dat het geen onderdeel van de EU zou worden (wat het toen en nu trouwens ook niet is) en het daarmee direct aansturen op de Speciale Militaire Operaties van Rusland.
• Het frustreren van diplomatieke onderhandelingen (de diplomaten van Oekraïne en Rusland kwamen al in april 2022 op hoofdlijnen een vredesakkoord overeen, maar dat werd door het westen (in persoon van Boris Johnson) afgeschoten. Want niet vrede, maar oorlog is het doel.
• En – most telling of all – het inmiddels al $67 miljard in de Oekraïne-oorlog pompen. Geld dat wordt betaald aan de oorlogsindustrie en wapenleveranciers die daarmee zorgen voor nog meer oorlog. Nog meer dode Russische en Oekrainse militairen. Nog meer Oost-Oekrainse burgers gedood met westerse wapens. 
  
  Let wel. $67 miljard alleen al van de VS. Een bedrag dat meer is dan het totale (!) Russische defensiebudget voor heel 2021.

Top 10 Countries with the Highest Military Expenditures (2020), bron: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/military-spending-by-country

---

Wil je ook iets doneren?

---

Hoog spel. Met opzet?

Tucker Carlson ziet de machinaties van het westen met lede ogen aan. Al een jaar of twee even verrassend (als intussen niet meer) dat juist uit deze hoek geluiden van zowel politiek links (Tulsi Gabbard, Michael Shellenberger, Glenn Greenwald) als politiek conservatief samen klinken in een strijd voor vrijheid, voor een open wetenschappelijk debat, voor transparantie, voor rechtstatelijkheid, voor gelijkheid voor de wet, voor gezondheid, voor vrede en voor gezond verstand.

Vanuit dit perspectief maakt Tucker Carlson zich – terecht – grote zorgen over de vrijwel grenzeloze westerse agressie. Waarin geen actie te goor, geen ingreep te gevaarlijk, geen positie te onhoudbaar, geen leugen te gek, geen false-flag te schaamteloos en geen sabotage te explosief lijkt. 

Waarin alle redelijkheid van tafel is, en waarin zelfs het risico van een kernoorlog op het Europese continent de machthebbers niet meer doet terug deinzen.

Sterker nog. Misschien is het wel de intentie…

---

– onderstaand de transcriptie van het hele fragment van Tucker Carlson – 

---

Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight. I hate to start a Tuesday evening on a grim note, but one of the environmental catastrophes, one of the great environmental catastrophes of our time, is unfolding tonight off the coast of Denmark. The Nord Stream pipelines, which were enormous Russian owned conduits that carry natural gas from Russia to Western Europe have been breached as we speak.

Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 are pouring millions of cubic meters of natural gas into the Baltic. Pictures from the air, which you can now see on your screen, show a toxic bubble field more than half a mile wide. You can only guess at how many marine mammals are being killed right now. Countless, but the lasting damage may be to the atmosphere.

Natural gas is comprised of up to 90% Methane. Methane, as Joe Biden has often told you, is the key driver of global warming, which is of course ‘an essential threat to humanity and the planet’. So if you’re worried about climate change, what just happened to the Nord Stream pipelines is as close to the apocalypse as we have ever come.

So the question is, how did this happen? And it turns out it was not an accident. At the very same time that leaks in these pipelines were detected, Swedish officials recorded two powerful undersea explosions, each one of which was equivalent to hundreds of pounds of TNT. Nothing in nature can account for that.

Almost immediately the pipelines began leaking in three separate places. So there’s only one explanation for what happened: this was an act of industrial terrorism. That was very obvious to the Prime Minister of Poland, and he wasted no time in saying so. Watch. 

“Today we are also dealing with an act sabotage. We do not know the details of what happened. But we can clearly see that it is an act of sabotage, an act that probably marks the next stage in the escalation of the situation we are dealing with in Ukraine.” 

We can clearly see, he said, this was an act of sabotage, an act of terrorism. Well, yes, we can see that.

So the question is who did it? And of course the prime suspect is obvious. It would be the same man who caused domestic inflation here in the US and stole the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. That’d be Vladimir Putin. The Washington Post got right to it. Putin, they declared, is now weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines.

According to the Canadian ambassador to the UN, Vladimir Putin has decided to use “pollution as an act of war”. Progressive Twitter strongly endorsed this conclusion. “Putin did it” and that makes sense until you thought about it for just a moment. Vladimir Putin may be evil, they tell us that he is evil, but is he stupid?

Probably isn’t stupid, and yet, and here’s the strange part, if you are Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines. That’s the one thing you would never do. Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth, and most critically, your leverage over other countries.

Europe needs your energy now more than ever with winter approaching. If you can’t deliver that energy, then countries like Germany have no need to pay attention to what you want. You’re in the middle of a war, an all hands on deck war. So you need all the leverage you can get. 

Under these circumstances there is no chance you would blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2, not now, obviously. In fact, it’s so obvious that even our famously dim Secretary of State, Tony Blink, seem to acknowledge it. Sabotaging Nord Stream, he said, today, is “clearly in no one’s interest”. 

Right. But really only half right. It is true that blowing up Nords Stream does not help Vladimir Putin. He would not do that. Why would he? But that doesn’t mean that other countries wouldn’t consider doing it. They would consider it, and we know they have considered it because at least one of them has said so, in public in early February, less than three weeks before the war in Ukraine began, Joe Biden suggested -on camera- that he might take out these pipelines.

Biden: “If Russia invades, uh, that means tanks or troops crossing the, uh, the, the border of Ukraine again, then uh, there will be, uh, we, there will be no longer a north team too. We, we will bring it into it.”

Journalist: ” How will you, how will you do that exactly? Since the project and control of the project is within Germany’s control?”

Biden: “We will, uh, I promise you, we’ll be able to do it.”

Notice how he phrased that and he’s the president, he doesn’t phrase things by accident, particularly when he is reading off cards. He didn’t say “I will pause the delivery of gas from Russia to Germany”, he said, “there won’t be a Nord Stream 2”. We’ll put an end to it. We’ll take it out. We’ll blow it up. 

“How will you do this?” He was asked, “I promise you we will be able to do it.” They thought this through. And yet those watching, very much including us, didn’t take Biden seriously when he said it. This is the president who has declared climate change, the most pressing emergency in the history of the world. This is the man who lectures you about using a wood stove or driving an SUV because if it’s emissions. This is the guy who spent billions trying to mitigate cow flatulence because of methane. Would that guy really blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea? It was hard to imagine. That would be an unimaginably reckless act. That’d be the kind of thing you would do if you wanted to start a nuclear war. It would be insane. And yet in retrospect, it’s obvious they were thinking about this because Joe Biden wasn’t the only person to suggest it. Victoria at the State Department said pretty much the very same.

Nuland is a lifelong war cheerleader. She worked to bring about the Iraq invasion, never apologized, kept going. She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government some years back. So capable. Clearly she’s capable of anything. But environmental terrorism. Even for Victoria Nuland, that seemed too much, too extreme, and yet here she is in January:

Nuland: “With regard to Nord Stream 2, uh, we continue to have, uh, very strong and clear conversations, uh, with our German allies. And I wanna be clear with you today: if Russia invades Ukraine one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward! One way or the other. We’ll stop Nord Stream.” 

Now looking back, those words seem chilling eight months later as natural gas pours into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere. So you have to ask, could the Biden administration really do something like this? We can’t say for sure. We don’t know for sure. We can tell you that close allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it. 

Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician. He’s chairman of the EU -USA Delegation in the European Parliament. He’s connected. He’s also the husband of regime stenographer Ann Applebaum of the Atlantic Magazine. Sikorski is so close to Joe Biden, he’s got a picture of the two of them together in his Twitter profile. So when the pipelines blew up, Sikorski responded immediately, and here’s what he wrote; “Thank you USA!” 

So once again, did the Biden administration really do this? It’s hard to believe, given that it’s an atrocity, it’s effectively an act of terrorism, we don’t wanna make that accusation. But we should tell you that -maybe not coincidentally- today a brand new pipeline was unveiled. The pipeline that carries non-Russian natural gas in roughly the same area as Nord Streams 1 and 2.

This is called the Baltic Pipe. It was inaugurated in Poland. It will carry natural gas from Norway through Denmark to Poland and other countries nearby. And it’s likely to do very well since now… it has less competition. Making sense? What does the White House say about this? How are they accounting for what happened today?

Well, they’re not exactly enthusiastically denying responsibility for it. Instead, they’re looking at the upside. Here’s the president’s publicist, noting that the destruction of yet another energy pipeline is yet another opportunity for you to buy an electric car. 

White House Press Secretary: “Uh, as you all know, these pipelines weren’t pumping gas into Europe at this time. Uh, Nord Stream 2 was never operational, as you guys know, Nord Stream 1 has not been operational for weeks because, uh, Putin has weaponized, uh, energy. And we have said this many times before. This just drives home the. Of our efforts to work together to get alternative gas, uh, supplies to Europe and to support efforts to reduce gas, uh, consumption, and accelerate true energy independence by moving to clean energy, uh, economy.”

Oh, “moving to clean energy”, say that people who very may well be responsible for letting methane, into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere at a scale that most people can’t imagine. The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time in its effect on the environment.

If they did this, this will be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has ever done. But it would also be totally consistent with what they. What do they do? They destroy. These people, build nothing, not one thing. Instead, they tear down and they desecrate. From historic statues to the constitution to energy infrastructure. And no one in Congress is trying to stop any of it.

They’re just preparing for the inevitable fallout. Tonight, the Senate just advanced is spending bill with 35 million for the Department of Energy to “prepare for, and respond to potential nuclear and radiological incidents in Ukraine.” The spending bill also brings the total US expenditure on Ukraine, the war, but also funding its government and energy for Ukraine, to 67 billion on the eve of what could be a massive economic disruption here to our economy.

$67 billion. How much is that? Well, it’s more than Russia’s entire military budget last year. And Congress is expected to fully pass the bill later this week with Republicans nodding along like the zombies they are. 

What will be the effect of this? Every action has a reaction, equal and opposite. Blow up the Nord Stream pipelines. Okay. We’ve entered a new phase. One in which the United States is directly at war with the largest nuclear power in the world. Doesn’t mean it’ll go nuclear immediately, but it does suggest there could be consequences. 

If we actually blew up the North Dream pipe, why wouldn’t Russia sever undersea internet cables? What would happen if they did that? What would happen if banks in London couldn’t communicate with banks in New York? Just that one piece of it. Leaving aside its potential effects on our power grid, but let’s just say the banks couldn’t communicate with each other for one day. What the economic effect of that be? Or would it cascade downward into your house? 

We can have an actual collapse. We could wind up very quickly in third world conditions. Those are the stakes. Had the people behind this, the geniuses like Victoria Nuland considered the effects? Maybe they have. Maybe that was the point. 

Like

Comment

Share

“ de grondstroom van totalitarisme is het blinde vertrouwen in een statistisch-cijfermatig onderbouwde ‘wetenschappelijke fictie’ die een ‘radicale minachting’ voor de feiten vertoont” – Hannah Arendt

---

Je kan ons ook volgen op Telegram. En op Twitter en Youtube. Was het artikel de moeite waard vond je? Dan  🆆🅰🆃 🅰🅻🆂 misschien eens delen. Dankjewel!

blckbx today

21 SEPTEMBER 2022

blckbx today #77: oorlogsretoriek ontmaskerd | 5,2 miljard voor covid-regels | Miljoenennota debacle

Redactie BlckbxGekopieerd!

Vladimir Poetin gaat 300.000 extra militairen naar Oekraïne sturen en Europa staat weer op scherp. Ernst Kuipers is een nieuwe vaccinatiecampagne gestart en het kabinet alloceerde 5,2 miljard euro in de miljoenennota voor nieuwe coronamaatregelen in 2023. Kunnen we de miljoenennota nog serieus nemen? Dat en meer in blckbx today.

Woensdag 21 september 2022

In de uitzending van vanavond onder andere:

• Vladimir Poetin gaat 300.000 extra militairen naar Oekraïne sturen en Europa staat weer op scherp. “Oekraïne móét winnen want Poetins oorlog is óók onze oorlog”, aldus de EU en ons hele kabinet in koor. Maar is het wel onze oorlog? Psycholoog Huibrecht Boluijt analyseert de oorlogsretoriek die de Nederlandse burger meetrekt in een neerwaartse spiraal.
• Tussen al het voorpaginanieuws over Prinsjesdag en Oekraine heeft minister Ernst Kuipers terloops de nieuwe vaccinatiecampagne gestart. Alsof het de normaalste zaak van de wereld is alloceerde het kabinet 5,2 miljard euro in de miljoenennota voor nieuwe coronamaatregelen in 2023. Journalist en jurist Sietske Bergsma praat ons bij.
• Daags na Prinsjesdag ligt de focus in Den Haag op de Algemene Politieke Beschouwingen die vandaag startten. Steunpakketten, de miljarden voor Oekraïne, voor Corona, Onderwijs en het klimaat springen in het zicht. Maar kunnen we de miljoenennota serieus nemen? Politicus Tom de Nooijer denkt van niet en legt uit waarom.
  
  
  Desk: fractievoorzitter CVO Tom de Nooijer, publicist Sietske Bergsma en gezondheidspsycholoog Huibrecht Boluijt
  Presentatie: Sanae Orchi

Bekijk hier de losse fragmenten uit de uitzending

Relevante achtergrondinformatie en bronnen

• Artikel nu.nl ‘’Run op vluchten vanuit Rusland na Poetins oproep tot extra vluchten’’
• Artikel Volkskrant ‘’Corona ontsnapt weer aan vaccin en steeds makkelijker’’
• Artikel Parool ‘’Een op de drie Nederlanders haalt zeker een prik maar de argumenten veranderen’’
• Twitterbericht vaccinatiecampagne
• Artikel Danish Health Authority ’Vaccination Against COVID-19’
• Publicatie Rijksoverheid Miljoenennota
• Artikel Volkskrant ‘’Rijksbegroting 2023: de chaos regeert’
• Youtube kanaal Koninklijk huis “Troonrede” 
• Video/interview ”Kaag verwerpt kritiek over Oekraïne-opmerking: ‘’Leed in Nederland is erg, maar er sterven mensen in een oorlog’’
• Video Nos.nl “Poetin kondigt gedeeltelijke mobilisatie af in televisietoespraak”
• Video/speech “Clare Daly spreekt in Europees parlement”
• Video Blckbx.tv ‘’Hectische start Algemene Beschouwingen met diverse punten van orde van Omtzigt, Marijnissen, Wilders’’
• Artikel NOS ‘’Dodental protesten Iran vanwege dood jonge vrouw loopt op’’ 
• Website Sietske Bergsma The Fire Online

Stel jouw vraag vooraf en LIVE tijdens de uitzending!

Kijkersvragen kunnen via onze Telegram ingestuurd worden. Redacteur Bas Reijnierse gaat daar door de vragen heen en wie weet komt jouw vraag dan in de uitzending! Wil je dat we jouw kijkersvraag zien? Volg ons op Telegram en stel je vraag: https://t.me/blckbxtv

Iedere maandag, woensdag en vrijdag LIVE om 19:00 uur

Het nieuws belicht vanuit het oogpunt dat je van blckbx gewend bent, diepgravend en kritisch. Dat is wat je van blckbx today kan verwachten. Onder aanvoering van Flavio Pasquino verzorgt het team van redacteuren, de webredactie, video editors, de regie en de techniek drie keer in de week dit unieke live actualiteitenprogramma. Hierbij zal geen enkel onderwerp geschuwd worden en streven wij ernaar om de nodige balans aan te brengen in het brede medialandschap.

blckbx today is iedere maandag, woensdag en vrijdag LIVE te zien op blckbx.tv om 19:00 uur. Heb je de uitzending gemist of wil je op een later moment blckbx today terugkijken? blckbx today is na afloop altijd terug te kijken via blckbx.tv. 

Kijken dus en deel blckbx today in jouw eigen omgeving!

Over Stichting blckbx

Blckbx is een stichting zonder winstoogmerk die wordt gefinancierd door donaties van haar eigen publiek. Voor de mensen, door de mensen en met de mensen: dát is waar blckbx voor staat.

Hoewel we zorgdragen om de kosten zo minimaal te houden, zijn er toch doorlopende kosten om gedegen en professionele content te maken. Denk hierbij aan de techniek, de regie, de redactie, de webredactie en het onderhoud van de studio. Om de continuïteit van blckbx te waarborgen, hebben we daarom jouw hulp nodig.

Als je deze uitzending waardeert en de urgentie van Nederlands grootste onafhankelijke nieuwsplatform inziet, dan nodigen we je van harte uit om ons te steunen. Alleen dankzij regelmatige donaties kunnen wij onafhankelijke content blijven produceren en onze reikwijdte vergroten, met als doel om de wereld beter te begrijpen. Voor de mensen, door de mensen en met steeds méér mensen.Steun je ons?Lees 15 reactiesLees verder

12 SEPTEMBER 2022

Greenpeace-oprichter: ‘Klimaatverandering is gebaseerd op leugens’

Redactie BlckbxGekopieerd!3:50

Patrick Moore, mede-oprichter van Greenpeace, zegt dat de organisatie is ‘gekaapt door linkse activisten die onnodig angst aanwakkeren, zodat het publiek hen geld stuurt’. Het verhaal over klimaatverandering is volgens hem gebaseerd op leugens.

Moore promoveerde in 1974 in de ecologie aan de University of British Columbia en ontving in 2005 een eredoctoraat in de wetenschap aan de North Carolina State University. Hij was in 1971 één van de oprichters van Greenpeace, maar verliet de organisatie in 1986 uit onvrede over de ingeslagen weg. 

Op basis van e-mailcorrespondentie tussen Moore en de Zuid-Koreaanse professor milieuwetenschappen Seok-soon Park publiceerde The Epoch Times een uitgebreid interview, waarin Moore in niet mis te verstane bewoordingen het klimaatalarmisme onderuithaalt. 

‘Gekaapt’

“Greenpeace werd ‘gekaapt’ door politiek links toen ze zich realiseerden dat er geld en macht zat in de milieubeweging. Linksgeoriënteerde politieke activisten in Noord-Amerika en Europa veranderden Greenpeace van een op wetenschap gebaseerde organisatie in een politieke fondsenwervende organisatie,” zegt hij. “De ‘milieubeweging’ is meer een politieke beweging geworden. Ze zijn vooral gericht op het creëren van verhalen die angst en schuldgevoel aanjagen, zodat het publiek hen geld stuurt.”

Ook het Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – het klimaatpanel van de Verenigde Naties – is volgens Moore verre van neutraal. “Het IPCC is geen wetenschappelijke organisatie,” zegt hij. “Het is een politieke organisatie die bestaat uit de Wereld Meteorologische Organisatie en het Milieuprogramma van de Verenigde Naties. Het IPCC huurt wetenschappers in om hen te voorzien van ‘informatie’ die het verhaal van de ‘klimaatnoodsituatie’ ondersteunt. Hun campagnes tegen fossiele brandstoffen, kernenergie, CO2 en plastic zijn misleidend en bedoeld om mensen te laten denken dat de wereld zal vergaan, tenzij we onze beschaving lamleggen en onze economie vernietigen. Ze hebben nu een negatieve invloed op de toekomst van zowel het milieu als de menselijke beschaving.” 

Zogenaamd uitstervende ijsberen

Greenpeace gebruikt een groot deel van de donaties voor advertenties en fondsenwervingsprogramma’s. Vrijwel al dit soort campagnes zijn gebaseerd op onwaarheden, volgens Moore, die het voorbeeld van ‘de uitstervende ijsberen’ aanhaalt. 

“Het IJsbeerverdrag, dat in 1973 door alle poollanden is ondertekend om de onbeperkte jacht op ijsberen te verbieden, wordt nooit genoemd in de media, door Greenpeace, of door politici die zeggen dat de ijsbeer uitsterft door het smeltende ijs op de Noordpool. In feite is de ijsbeerpopulatie toegenomen van 6.000 – 8.000 in 1973 tot 30.000 – 50.000 nu. Dit wordt niet betwist,” zegt Moore. “Maar nu zeggen ze dat de ijsbeer in 2100 zal uitsterven, alsof ze een magische kristallen bol hebben die de toekomst kan voorspellen. Er lag de afgelopen winter op de Noordpool meer ijs ten opzichte van voorgaande jaren, en Antarctica was de afgelopen winter kouder dan in de afgelopen vijftig jaar.”

Demonisering van CO2

“Er zijn maar weinig mensen die geloven dat de wereld niet opwarmt. Het is duidelijk dat de wereld opwarmt sinds ongeveer het jaar 1700, 150 jaar voordat we fossiele brandstoffen gebruikten. 1700 was het hoogtepunt van de Kleine IJstijd, die zeer koud was en mislukte oogsten en hongersnood veroorzaakte,” zegt Moore. “Zelfs tot ongeveer 1950 waren de hoeveelheid gebruikte fossiele brandstoffen en de CO2-uitstoot zeer gering in vergelijking met vandaag. We weten niet wat de oorzaak is van deze periodieke temperatuurschommelingen, maar het was zeker niet CO2.” 

Moore noemt de demonisering van CO2 ‘compleet belachelijk’. Volgens hem is CO2 de basis van al het leven op aarde en is vandaag de concentratie ervan in de atmosfeer, zelfs met de stijging, lager dan ze was voor een groot deel van het bestaan van het leven.

Meer CO2, meer groen

Uit een studie van 2013 blijkt dat de toename van CO2 de afgelopen dertig jaar heeft bijgedragen tot een toename van het groene bladerdek in de dorre gebieden van de wereld. De Australische overheidsinstelling CSIRO voerde dat onderzoekuit in samenwerking met de Australian National University (ANU). De gegevens waren gebaseerd op satellietwaarnemingen van het jaar 1982 tot 2010 in delen van de dorre gebieden in Australië, Noord-Amerika, het Midden-Oosten en Afrika. 

In het bestudeerde gebied werd er een toename van 11 procent gevonden in het bladerdek als gevolg van wat ‘CO2-bemesting’ wordt genoemd. Volgens de studie treedt een bevruchtingseffect op wanneer verhoogde CO2-niveaus een blad tijdens fotosynthese – het proces waarbij groene planten zonlicht omzetten in suiker – in staat stellen meer koolstof uit de lucht te halen of minder water aan de lucht te verliezen, of beide.

Doel van het doemdenken

“Ik geloof dat de menselijke bevolking altijd kwetsbaar is geweest voor mensen die onheil voorspellen met valse verhalen,” zegt Moore. “De Azteken gooiden maagden in vulkanen, en de Europeanen en Amerikanen verbrandden 200 jaar lang vrouwen als heksen met de bewering dat dit de wereld zou ‘redden’ van slechte mensen. Dit wordt ‘kuddementaliteit’, ‘groepsdenken’ of ‘sektegedrag’ genoemd. Mensen zijn sociale dieren met een hiërarchie en het is het makkelijkst om een hoge positie te verwerven door angst en controle te gebruiken.”

Volgens Moore gaan de apocalyptische klimaatvoorspellingen vooral over ‘politieke macht en controle’. Daarom zet hij zich in om mensen te laten zien dat de situatie niet zo negatief is als hen wordt verteld. “Vandaag maken onze nakomelingen beslissingen waar onze kleinkinderen voor zullen moeten betalen,” zegt hij. “Voorspellingen dat de wereld vergaat, worden al duizenden jaren gedaan. Niet één keer is dit uitgekomen. Waarom zouden we het nu wel geloven?”

Patrick Moore is één van de meer dan 1.200 wetenschappers die hun handtekening hebben gezet onder de World Climate Declaration van het Nederlandse Clintel. Deze verklaring stelt dat er geen sprake is van een klimaatcrisis.

Over stichting blckbx

Blckbx is een stichting zonder winstoogmerk die wordt gefinancierd door donaties van haar eigen publiek. Voor de mensen, door de mensen en met de mensen: dát is waar blckbx voor staat.

Hoewel we ervoor zorgen dat we de kosten zo minimaal mogelijk houden, zijn er toch doorlopende kosten om gedegen en professionele content te maken. Denk hierbij aan de techniek, de regie, de redactie, de webredactie en het onderhoud van de studio. Om de continuïteit van blckbx te waarborgen, hebben we daarom jouw hulp nodig.

Als je dit artikel waardeert en de urgentie van Nederlands grootste onafhankelijke nieuwsplatform inziet, dan nodigen we je van harte uit om ons te steunen. Alleen dankzij regelmatige donaties kunnen wij onafhankelijke content blijven produceren en onze reikwijdte vergroten, met als doel om de wereld beter te begrijpen. Voor de mensen, door de mensen en met steeds méér mensen.Steun je ons?LEES OOK: Enorme koraalgroei Great Barrier Reef ondanks…LEES OOK: Zomerijs op Noordpool bereikt op twee na hoogste niveau…Lees 1 reactiesLees meer over: Patrick MooreGreenpeaceKlimaatalarmismeIJsberenIPCCDeel dit artikel: FacebookTwitterWhatsappMailLinkGekopieerd!

Andere relevante artikelen

1:40KLIMAAT07 SEP.Klimaatdoelen gaan vóór hulp aan burgers, zegt minister Kaag5:20KLIMAAT03 SEP.Zomerijs op Noordpool bereikt op twee na hoogste niveau sinds 2007

Reacties

Hier kan je discussiëren over het nieuws, vragen stellen en inhoudelijk iets bijdragen aan artikelen.Aanmelden om te reagerenRequin10 dagen geleden

CO2 als LEUGEN
_____________________________
We zullen wel weer zien hoe dit afloopt: Wat ik een veeg teken vindt dat BVNL, BBB en PVV ondanks verbale spierballental geen jurische acties tegen Kaag, Rutte, Maxima cs, starten: Daar kun je als rechter moeilijker om heen:

Het lijkt erop dat voor 11 november het WEF met Maxima (MIJN BOZE GEDACHTE) aanstuurt op de forméél volledige uitschakeling van de eerste en tweede kamer;
Het zal DAN een conflict worden tussen ca 30:000 wakkere burgers en circa 30:000 landverraders.0Trending artikelenMEER CORONAVRIJDAGHet nieuwe normaal: Ziekenhuis zendt myocarditis-commercial uit in New YorkCORONA16 SEP.VWS misleidde bevolking met vaccin-reclame-slogan ‘Je doet het voor een ander’CORONA13 SEP.Artsen roepen wereldwijde medische crisis uit wegens sterfte door COVID-vaccinsBUITENLAND08 SEP.Zwitserland geeft ‘energieverspillers’ gevangenisstraf, boetes in ItaliëCORONA05 SEP.Ivermectine zorgt voor 92 procent daling in COVID-sterfte, aldus grote peer reviewed studieKlimaatMEER KLIMAAT07 SEP.Klimaatdoelen gaan vóór hulp aan burgers, zegt minister KaagKLIMAAT03 SEP.Zomerijs op Noordpool bereikt op twee na hoogste niveau sinds 2007KLIMAAT06 AUG.Enorme koraalgroei Great Barrier Reef ondanks doemvoorspellingenKLIMAAT28 JUL.Ook ING gaat klanten wijzen op ‘goede’ en ‘foute’ aankopenKLIMAAT11 JUL.Oppositie wil spoeddebat om ‘achtergehouden’ stikstofcijfers

Sluit je aan bij de blckbx community:

NieuwsbriefOntvang altijd de nieuwste blckbx content in je inbox!SCHRIJF JE IN Eenmalige donatieWij zijn blij met iedere donatie, groot én klein.STEUN ONS Maandelijkse donatieSteun ons met een vast bedrag per maand. Klein of groot.STEUN ONS De redactie van blckbx onderzoekt en publiceert de laatste nieuwsfeiten uit binnen- en buitenland.

Heartmath

trueman show

The Trueman Show #88 Edwin Selij

“A little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing in the hands of the uninformed”, by Robert W Malone MD,

A little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing in the hands of the uninformed by Robert W Malone MD, MSSep 13 ▷  LISTENSAVE “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”philosopher George SantayanaRobespierre and the Committee of Public SafetyThe Reign of Terror was a period in the French Revolution marked by a series of massacres and pubic execution that took place in an atmosphere marked by revolutionary fervor, anti-nobility sentiments and wild accusations of the Jacobin faction led by Maximilien Robespierre and the Committee of Public Safety.  This period of the Jacobin rule was the first time in history that terror became an official government policy with the stated aim to use violence to achieve a higher political goal.The Reign of Terror  (September 5, 1793 – July 28, 1794), also known as The Terror, was a period of violence during the French Revolution incited by conflict between two rival political factions, the Girondins (moderate republicans) and the Jacobins (radical republicans), and marked by mass executions of “the enemies of the revolution.” The foundation of the Terror was centered around the April 1793 creation of the Committee of Public Safety. As a wartime measure, the Committee was given broad supervisory powers over military, judicial, and legislative efforts. Its power peaked between August 1793 and July 1794 under the leadership of Robespierre, who established a virtual dictatorship. On June 1794, Robespierre, who favored deism over atheism, recommended that the Convention acknowledge the existence of his god. The next day, the worship of the deistic Supreme Being was inaugurated as an official aspect of the revolution. As a result of Robespierre’s insistence on associating terror with virtue, his efforts to make the republic a morally united patriotic community became equated with the endless bloodshed. Shortly after that, following a decisive military victory over Austria at the Battle of Fleurus, Robespierre was overthrown on July 27, 1794.As someone identified by many as a key leader in this “global resistance to medical tyranny” movement, I have tried to keep my eye on a wide range of potential threats, while also doing my best to help guide things while also helping all of us to make sense out of what we are being subjected to. And among the things that I worry about on a daily basis is the rise of Jacobinism. The risk of developing a culture that promotes and thrives on circular firing squads and conspiracy theories. We have plenty to focus on without that sort of drama. We are seeing the beginning of Jacobinism develop with our hypnotized opponents, just as my friend and scholar of mass movements Dr. Mattias Desmet had long predicted. Those who are participating in “The Mass” are beginning to attack their own, with WEF-young leader trained Dr. Lena Wen being one of the first targets for the unforgivable sin of becoming more reasonable about masking and school policies. And I have seen it all along, cropping up from time to time, within our ranks also. But one particular cell of conspirators seems to have invested quite a bit of energy in lobbing grenades at me of late. If you know of whom I refer, then good on you. If not, then please just consider this essay a general warning concerning historic human behaviors. There is no upside in further publicizing the names of those who so desperately seek attention.Currently we are in a period of transition. In some ways, we can now see the end of the battle, and it looks like we may win this one. In others, we can see that this COVIDcrisis is really just a skirmish in a much larger war that has been going on for decades. Many, including myself, have been unaware of what has really been going on for decades at the WEF, the BMGF, the UN, the WHO, the various organizations supported by King George III, etc. Others have had their eyes open for a long time. But the COVIDcrisis seems to be loosing momentum (one hopes), the passion is finally draining out, and the fever appears to have broken. There are signs that the opposition is starting to pivot to new battlegrounds. (please consider following Tatsuya_Ishida @Tatsuya_Ishida. Brilliant social commentary bravely composed regarding forbidden topics!) Transitions are difficult. Over the last couple of years, many have build new empires, new personas, new business models based on various aspects of the COVIDcrisis. Some sell air filters on line which purport to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from the air. Others have made a lot of money selling overpriced vitamins and supplements. Some have gone from preparing for retirement to traveling all the time while writing daily substack articles. Some are busy making money by selling books chronicling their experiences. And others have gone from working as a bounty hunter to operating a small podcast media business. All of these now face a new threat (I personally think “existential threat” is over used) – that threat being change. Some will adapt to the new threat, information and strategy landscape, others will fall away. The only predictable constant going forward from here will be change. Earlier today, a colleague wrote to me “Do you perceive that we are fated to participate in a globalist world?” My reply? “The future truly hangs in the balance. As the Mormons say, the constitution hangs by a thread. As for me, I have my “Gault’s gulch” and my marriage.“ I will remain as long as I can be useful to the cause, and then I will be gone. Or maybe before. Who knows. Death is my councilor.The rise of Jacobinism occurred during a period of transition. Cultural and political transitions are inherently unstable.In June 1793, Paris sections took over the Convention, calling for administrative and political purges, a low fixed price for bread, and a limitation of the electoral franchise to sans-culottes alone. The Jacobins identified themselves with the popular movement and the sans-culottes, who in turn saw popular violence as a political right. The sans-culottes, exasperated by the inadequacies of the government, invaded the Convention and overthrew the Girondins. In their place they endorsed the political ascendancy of the Jacobins.On June 24, the Convention adopted the first republican constitution of France, the French Constitution of 1793. It was ratified by public referendum, but never put into force. Like other laws, it was indefinitely suspended and in October, it was announced that the government of France would be “revolutionary until the peace.”Although the Girondins and the Jacobins were both on the extreme left and shared many of the same radical republican convictions, the Jacobins were more brutally efficient in setting up a war government.And now, at this period of transition, with so many moving parts that need to be managed, I once again have to deal with fragging. Grenades are being lobbed. Fragments of information are being grabbed out of my CV or cyberspace, inferences made, and people with little to no comprehension of the context are spinning up wild accusations without taking the time to develop an understanding of what is really going on. People with no prior governmental experience and a high school education are drawing conclusions which seem to mostly be a projection of their worst fears. Words are being said, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, Creeps in this petty pace from day to day To the last syllable of recorded time, And all our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle! Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player That struts and frets his hour upon the stage And then is heard no more: it is a tale Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, Signifying nothing.[William Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 5] So let’s get down to the accusations being madly tossed about. I have previously addressed these accusations both months ago and now once again in various chats on Telegram and other cesspool forums where crazy rumors circulate. Sorry, but I cannot deal wither what goes on with Twitter, as I am banned and have been since immediately before the Rogan interview (what a strange coincidence!). Recognizing, of course, that:He that complies against his will, Is of his own opinion still.[Samuel Butler (1612-1680): Hudibras]J’accuse! #1: Dr. Robert Malone is actually controlled opposition because he has a conflict of interest stemming from the vaccine he is developing called “RelCovax”!There are many variants of this accusation which are circulating. @astounded writes: “Can you explain what is going on with your NEW MRNA development? Seems to be some conflict I’ve read. Thank you”@Lab_Mom writes: “Why have you never announced you are CURRENTLY working for the NIH developing the next SARS-COV-2 vaccine???”And this is an example of a hybrid combining J’Accuse #1 and J’Accuse #2The name of this vaccine candidate refers to Reliance COVID vaccine. Reliance vaccines is a company started by Reliance Industries of India. Reliance vaccines hired me as a consultant (remember, before all of this, I ran a clinical research, proposal development, and regulatory affairs consulting business for decades?) to provide some advice and guidance to a new team that was being developed to create inexpensive new infectious disease vaccines – largely for the poor of India and emerging economy countries who are not well served by western big pharma. The consulting gig amounted to about once a week participating in a two hour zoom call in the middle of the night with India, listening to the executive team, providing advice when requested, and occasionally reviewing a document or two. Reliance is owned by Mukesh Ambani, one of the wealthiest people in the world, who once served in a leadership position at the WEF. Which I knew nothing about at the time. When I began helping the new team at this new vaccine startup to make various strategic business decisions (which are none of anyone’s business other than Reliance vaccines), they were not focused on developing a low cost, low tech vaccine for COVID. Remember, there are basically a billion poor in India. And companies like Reliance have requirements from the Indian government to basically tithe into a fund that goes to helping the poor. The intention was to use that fund to provide inexpensive, low tech vaccines (using well established traditional vaccine manufacturing processes and methods) for poor people. At the time, the only COVID vaccines were expensive and high tech gene therapy types, and those were really hard to get. The team developing RelCoVax was new – as a team- but mostly consisted of very experienced vaccine development specialists assembled from other established Indian vaccine companies.The technical approach chosen for developing RelCoVax is somewhat similar to that used by Peter Hotez for his vaccine, but was developed completely independently, and when the wraps were taken off of Peter’s vaccine (which is also manufactured in India, I believe), the RelCoVax team stalled a bit. Plus, in India, the regulatory authorities follow more strict guidelines that the FDA does – even before the FDA basically threw their rulebook into the trash. But the Indian regulatory authority has had some nasty experiences with new vaccines, notably ones pushed by the BMGF, and has become very wary and insistent that there be no shortcuts taken. Which takes time. As for me, my contract expired with Reliance just as this whole COVIDcrisis vaccine mess really heated up, and neither side sought to renew it. My last deliverable was preparation and presentation of a slide deck for a European vaccine conference (one of the reasons I took the Moderna jab was that I knew I was likely to need to go to France for the conference), which slide deck described the RelCoVax product. Date of the actual presentation was 22 September 2021, almost exactly a year ago. Here is the key slide describing the vaccine product candidate (below). I have no ownership or financial interest in this project or product. It is not and has never been “my vaccine”. It is not an mRNA vaccine. Anyone who states otherwise is spreading lies for some reason, some agenda. I will let you speculate about motives. Note that this vaccine does not include full length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (unlike Novavax), rather it includes the receptor binding domain of Spike as well as another antigen, the nucleocapsid. It is highly likely to not have the “clot shot” adverse event profile of either the genetic vaccines or the Novavax product. But time will tell on that, and I have complete confidence that the Reliance team and the Indian Regulatory Authority will insist that all of the proper tests are done.For those who want to dig further, the slide deck which I presented can be found here. I have no idea of what developmental stage this vaccine product candidate is currently at. I am not involved in the project any longer. Any who consult for a living know that it is really not appropriate to discuss clients and their projects on public forums, but it seems that the conspiracy theorists have a sense of entitlement which much be addressed. And this slide deck was presented in a public forum, so there is that.Moving on to the next wild accusation…J’accuse! #2: Dr. Robert Malone is actually controlled opposition because he is currently working for the NIH/NIAID through the ACTIV program developing a next generation mRNA vaccine!This is one recent variant of a variety of similar accusations which have been thrown at me over the last couple of years because I have won or managed billions in federal contracts over the years. And have worked and published with people who are clearly deeeep state/intelligence/biodefense assets. These contracts have always been for other people, as for some reason my writing and technical skill has always been good enough to win contracts for others, but never NIH contracts for myself and my own research. I even wrote a proposal for an mRNA vaccine for coronaviruses back in the mid 1990s (oh-oh. Now they are going to weaponize that against me!), but it was rejected. As was my proposal to NIH/NIAID for development of pulsed electrical field driven polynucleotide delivery for vaccine purposes. Which was based on this paper and this paper and a few others. Way, way ahead of their time. Rejected because the study section “knew” that Merck vaccines had already solved the delivery problem for genetic vaccines. Which was also based on my work. But no, plenty for thee, none for me. Inder Verma warned me back in 1989 that if I left his lab at the Salk when I did, I would never get an NIH grant. And he was right. Which is why I turned to focusing on working with the US DoD in biodefense product development. But that is another story.I always find this line of attack strangely fascinating, in a twisted sort of way, as anyone who has actually followed what I have said, written and done over the last two years would have to conclude that if I am controlled opposition, I must be the worst double agent in the history of the United States. But conspiracy theorists are going to conspiracy theorize, and haters are going to hate. Just the way things are. Looking on the bright side, “Evil Cabal” is a definite step up from mass murderer, which is also an accusation that has been casually thrown about by many of these same people. Apparently I am accused of being a mass murderer for having invented the technology platform and idea (which the factcheckers and Alex Berenson dispute while disregarding the issued patents), as well as for promoting the work of Dr. Mattias Desmet regarding the Psychology of Totalitarianism. The latter is really hard (logically) for me to wrap my mind around, but there it is. The former I addressed at length in this substack article. And apparently I am now both a wolf in sheeps clothing as well as being the most interesting Doctor in the world. Which I filmed in support of that notorious deep state movie production “Plandemic 3”. Easy come, easy go. The proof of the accusation is everywhere you look. Mea culpa.So, what actually is ACTIV? Well, I have written about it before on this substack, and discussed it in various lectures as a source of NIH corruption, but, uh, yeah. See my prior statement that: The congressional charters for the “Foundation for the National Institutes of Health” and the “CDC Foundation” must be revoked. Sounds like I am definitely a part of the evil cabal. If your point of view is that of our opposition…. Which gets to the issue of psychological projection and low self esteem. Just saying. Not diagnosing.Back on topic- This is where it gets fascinating. A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing.Here is the NIH ACTIV web page.Yup, ACTIV has a component that used to be part of OWS. check. ACTIV is not part of OWS, rather OWS is now a part of ACTIV. Details. ACTIV is involved in vaccine development. Check. ACTIV is housed within the Foundation for NIH, which accepts money from Pharma and BMGF. Check. Never mind that I have called for the FNIH to have its charter dissolved. That must just be more deepstate double agent sneakiness on my part, right?Here’s the thing. I was a non-voting volunteer participant in the ACTIV TX- clinical trial working group. Put there at the request of my client DoD/DTRA, and in particular at the request of a GS14 that I had been mentoring at the request of a GS15 that I have known since he was a post Doc with Bob Gallo, and even before. Because I am an expert in clinical research, drug repurposing, virology, etc.  Although, to be clear, I have never worked as a Bounty Hunter or as a drug rep. I was allowed to listen and occasionally comment because the DoD/DTRA wanted me there. And when I mentioned my participation (I think it was on the Rogan show), and also mentioned that the (voting) Merck representative on the committee tried to block the Ivermectin trials from going forward, my GS14 colleague got a nastygram from ACTIV suggesting that I should not be allowed to participate. And not long after that I dropped off. Which is a shame, because the reason I was there was to help get our fully powered, innovative inpatient and outpatient trials of the repurposed drugs famotidine, celecoxib, and ivermectin launched under DoD/DTRA funding which I had worked so hard to get dedicated to this project. But which clinical trials the FDA notoriously blocked until we dropped the Ivermectin component at insistence of the aforementioned DoD GS15. And which project I no longer support, although the clinical trials eventually got started. And oh, by the way, snarky factcheckers at Associated Press and Washington Post, the data now show that I was right and famotidine (pepcid) use is therapeutic for COVID-19 disease. But that is another story for another day.So, was I or am I involved with NIH/NIAID and ACTIV in developing a second gen mRNA vaccine?  Absolutely not. Pure conspiracy thinking. The ACTIV TX (treatment) clinical trial working group is the group I was participating in (as a non-voting member), but have ceased participating in quite a while ago. I was trying to gather intel from the ACTIV TX-Clinical WG committee on behalf of and on request by my DoD/DTRA client so that we might get our inexpensive repurposed drug trial, involving repurposed drugs and combinations which I played a central role in identifying, so that we could save lives using readily available inexpensive products. Furthermore, ACTIV TX-Clinical WG is all about clinical trial design and management to test a range of pharmaceuticals, including both repurposed and new ones.  It has nothing to do with vaccine development.Now, with all of that said, who are the ones that are being disruptive, making wild unfounded accusations, spinning unfounded conspiracy theories and doing things which advance the interests of our opponents? And who is just working away, day after day, getting stuff done, writing substacks, and traveling all over the world trying to help people.Controlled opposition is an interesting matter. It exists. But when effective you can only identify it by its shadow and footprints. By the trail of damage that it leaves. But those who repeatedly shout “Wolf” deserve a bit of skepticism. In my opinion.

i was wrong , sorry

WEF